One of my co-workers recently inquired into the planning of my PhD and actually gasped when I answered no the question inquiring whether I was writing already.
FSP style, this conversation went something along the lines of:
CW: So when does your contract end?
FAW: End of october, why?
CW: So you’re already writing, yes?
FAW: Well, that depends on what you mean. If you mean the actual thesis, then no.
CW: GASP. But then when do you plan to defend? Not in october, no?
FAW: Well, no. Besides I already have 8 publications and I’m busy with a journal paper.
CW: So who are your supervisors?
FAW: CompanySupervisor2 and UniversitySupervisor.
CW: You don’t mind me asking, do you?
FAW: Well, today is really not a good day to discuss this, no.
He seems to have gotten the idea that the PhD students in our group can use some of his advice and time, but frankly most of the time all he does is waste my time because he likes to phrase things in very roundabout ways and “provocative comments”. The conversation was quite ludicrous, but alarmed me enough to warn CompanySupervisor2 of its occurrence – forewarned is forearmed, right?
When CS2 suggested that maybe I did prefer CW, I threatened to withhold the chocolate I bought for her birthday. I think that conveyed my sentiments most appropriately.